Feedback widget vs visual bug reporting into dev trackers (Jira, GitHub, Linear)
TL;DR
Marker.io is built for dev and QA teams. People report a bug, and it becomes a detailed ticket — console logs, browser info, session replay — synced into Jira, GitHub, or Linear. Say So is simpler. It catches feedback in your app (with an optional marked-up screenshot) and puts it in a calm inbox, no tracker required. Pick Marker.io if bugs need to land in your dev team's tracker with all the technical detail. Pick Say So if you just want feedback somewhere simple and don't run a formal QA process.
| Say So | Marker.io | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Feedback widget + calm inbox | Visual bug reports synced into dev trackers |
| Where bugs go | Your inbox, plus Slack or Linear | Jira, GitHub, Linear, and more, with two-way sync |
| Technical detail | Page URL, browser, optional screenshot | Console logs, network logs, session replay |
| Built for | Anyone — SaaS, agencies, no-code, creators | Dev and QA teams running UAT |
| Free plan | Yes — free for one project | Trial only, no free plan |
| Pricing | Flat $120/yr (unlimited) | Per seat, and key features sit on higher tiers |
Marker.io
Marker.io's whole job is turning a bug into a rich ticket inside Jira, GitHub, or Linear, with the technical detail a developer needs to reproduce it. If that's your workflow, it's very good at it.
Say So
Say So keeps feedback in a tidy inbox first — read it, tag it, mark it done. If a note is worth tracking, push it to Linear (with two-way status sync), Slack, or a webhook. But there's no tracker to wire up just to collect feedback.
Bugs that need to become Jira tickets with full technical detail? Marker.io. Feedback that just needs somewhere simple to land? Say So.
Marker.io
Console logs, network logs, session replay — great for hard technical bugs, but a common complaint is that it's overkill for simpler feedback, with a few too many steps to file something.
Say So
Say So is one tap. Type what's wrong, optionally mark up a screenshot, send. It's made for teams who want feedback without running a QA process.
If your reporters aren't QA engineers and the bugs aren't deeply technical, simpler usually wins.
Marker.io
Marker.io has no free plan, just a trial, and it charges per seat — with the features most people come for sitting on the pricier tier. Costs climb as you add people.
Say So
Say So is free for your first project, then a flat $120 a year for unlimited everything. Adding teammates doesn't change the price.
If you want a free way to start and a price that doesn't grow with your team, Say So is the cheaper path.
Marker.io turns bug reports into detailed tickets inside Jira, GitHub, or Linear, with technical detail for developers. Say So is a simpler widget — it catches feedback in your app and keeps it in a calm inbox, no tracker needed.
No. Say So keeps it light: the page URL, basic browser info, and an optional screenshot the person marks up. For console logs and session replay, Marker.io is the better choice.
Yes — Say So is free for one project, then $120 a year for unlimited. Marker.io runs on a trial and charges per seat, with no free plan.
That's who Say So is for. One tap, type, optionally mark up a screenshot, send — no account, no QA process. Marker.io is aimed more at dev and QA teams.
One script, a calm inbox, and a free Slack loop. Free forever for one project.
Already on Marker.io? See what switching looks like →